Patents
Full Federal Court strikes down patent for clopidogrel

The Full Federal Court has confirmed that Sanofi-Aventis’ patent for the drug clopidogrel (brand name Plavix) is invalid and should be revoked.  Subject to the question of whether Sanofi will seek a stay pending an application for leave to appeal to the High Court, the decision clears the way for Apotex and other companies to launch their own brands of clopidogrel, a drug designed to prevent platelet aggregation and blood clots, to compete directly with Sanofi.  read more »

:: Partner: Kim O'Connell :: Subjects: Patents
Fast-tracking patent applications for “green technology”

IP Australia has announced that requests for examination of patents involving green technology may be “fast-tracked”.  read more »

:: Partner: Kim O'Connell :: Subjects: Patents
What is patentable subject matter? Is the ‘manner of manufacture test’ on its way out (yet again)?

Do you think it's time to change the 'manner of manufacture' test??  The Advisory Council on Intellectual Property is seeking comments on a range of changes to patentable subject matter. Comments can be submitted to mail.acip@ipaustralia.gov.au by 13 November 2009.  For information on submitting comments click here.  read more »

:: Partner: Wayne McMaster :: Subjects: Patents
Consultation paper released on new R&D tax credit

On 18 September 2009, the Treasurer and Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research released a consultation paper on the new research and development tax incentive.  The new R&D tax incentive, announced as part of the 2009-2010 Budget, represents a significant change to the taxation of R&D expenditure in Australia.  read more »

:: Partner: Robert Cooper :: Subjects: Patents
UPDATE: Full Federal Court dismisses appeal in University of WA v Gray

Mallesons has published an alert on the Full Court decision, available here.

UPDATE: The Full Federal Court has dismissed the appeal.  read more »

:: Partner: Robert Cooper :: Subjects: Patents
Medrad v Alpine: Interlocutory injunction granted

Justice Kenny has granted an interlocutory injunction restraining the respondents from selling like-for-like replacements of popular CT contrast dye syringes.  Mallesons acted for the successful applicant.  The decision helps clarify the Court’s stance on the onus of proof for injunctions in patent cases, particularly where the sale is outside the PBS.  read more »

:: Partner: Wayne McMaster :: Subjects: Patents
Advisory Council on Intellectual Property releases Interim Report on Post-Grant Patent Enforcement Strategies

The Advisory Council on Intellectual Property has released an Interim Report on Post-Grant Enforcement Strategies proposing a number of reforms, including the establishment of an IP dispute resolution centre to provide opinions in relation to validity and infringement issues, and public access to information in relation to patent related Court proceedings.   read more »

:: Partner: Kim O'Connell :: Subjects: Patents | Technology
Hey Presto! Can magicians conjure up IP protection?

Spain's magicians are reportedly outraged by the exposure of their tricks and illusions on the "Masked Magician" television show.  Recent news reports indicate they are seeking legal advice on how best to protect their "IP", to avoid their craft from being undermined.  read more »

:: Partner: Natalie Hickey :: Subjects: Confidentiality | Copyright | Patents
Mallesons patent and pharmaceutical law specialist speaks at 2nd Annual Pharmaceutical Law Conference

Kim O’Connell, patent and pharmaceutical law specialist at Mallesons, spoke yesterday at the 2nd Annual Pharmaceutical Law Conference.  She joined other experts in the field to share her thoughts on the implications of some recent patent cases which have been handed down by the Federal Court.  read more »

:: Partner: Kim O'Connell :: Subjects: Patents
Careful consideration required when scoping assignments of future IP

Commercialisation of patents, particularly in the biotech sector, can be fraught with difficulties. So much is apparent from a recent NSW Supreme Court decision: Fermiscan v James. The case illustrates that a new invention, which would not have been made without knowledge of the same inventor’s prior art, is not automatically an “improvement” upon the inventor’s earlier inventions.  read more »

:: Partner: Patrick Gunning :: Subjects: Contracts | Patents