Since last Saturday (14 June), users of the popular social networking site have been able to to customise the URL of their profile pages, making them more distinctive and easier to remember.
Aliases were allocated on a first-come, first-served basis, which sparked a 'land rush' to claim the most popular names. Most common firstnames and surnames were claimed within minutes, leaving many disappointed at having to settle for 'facebook.com/john.smith5549'.
However, the launch was a clear success for trade mark owners, with Facebook taking an innovative approach to preventing 'namesquatting'.
How does the username scheme work?
The basic mechanism works as follows:
The complaints-based mechanism is similar to the trade marks policy recently unveiled by Google. Under this policy, the onus is on trade mark owners to notify Google of an infringing use of their mark, at which point the alleged infringer must satisfy Google that it has authorisation to use the mark in the relevant territory.
What should trade mark owners do?
So far, Facebook's measures seem to be working. However, trade mark owners will need to act quickly to ensure that they are not left behind:
With the growing number of user-generated social-networking websites such as Facebook, MySpace and Twitter, online trade mark protection is becoming increasingly complicated by the myriad ways in which marks and identities may be misused. Facebook’s pre-emptive approach to protecting trade mark rights seems to strike a happy medium between certainty to rights holders and fairness to the wider public. However, whether it will provide an effective forum for resolving online squatting disputes remains to be seen.