<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://blogs.mallesons.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Mallesons IP Whiteboard - Confidentiality</title>
 <link>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/subjects/Confidentiality</link>
 <description>The latest posts from Mallesons&#039; IP blog delivered to you via RSS.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>TwitterLeaks - personal information not so private in Web 2.0</title>
 <link>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/twitterleaks-personal-information-not-so-private-in-web-20</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A US Court has ordered Twitter to produce electronic records of three Twitter account holders to the United States Government as part of the criminal investigation into WikiLeaks, Jullian Assange and Bradley Manning. The case raises interesting questions as to how far the First Amendment (freedom of speech) and Fourth Amendment (privacy) rights extend in the world of social media. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/twitterleaks-personal-information-not-so-private-in-web-20&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/twitterleaks-personal-information-not-so-private-in-web-20#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/subjects/confidentiality">Confidentiality</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/sectors/technology-media-entertainment-telecommunications/technology">Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/relevant-partner/select-a-partner/natalie-hickey">Natalie Hickey</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:12:29 +1100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mallesons IP Whiteboard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">563 at http://blogs.mallesons.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Review Panel prescribes greater transparency for the TGA</title>
 <link>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/review-panel-prescribes-greater-transparency-for-the-tga</link>
 <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Last month, the Parliamentary Secretary for Health &amp;amp; Ageing released a &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.tga.gov.au/newsroom/review-tga-transparency-1101.htm &quot;&gt;Report&lt;/a&gt; into ways of improving the transparency of the Therapeutic Goods Administration.  The Report found that the TGA could improve the way it communicates with industry, consumers and healthcare practitioners and made 21 recommendations to this effect. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/review-panel-prescribes-greater-transparency-for-the-tga&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/review-panel-prescribes-greater-transparency-for-the-tga#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/subjects/confidentiality">Confidentiality</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/sectors/consumer-retail">Consumer &amp;amp; retail</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/sectors/health-pharmaceuticals">Health &amp;amp; pharmaceuticals</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/relevant-partner/select-a-partner/kim-oconnell">Kim O&amp;#039;Connell</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:08:43 +1000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mallesons IP Whiteboard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">512 at http://blogs.mallesons.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Supreme Court dismisses confidential information claim</title>
 <link>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/supreme-court-dismisses-confidential-information-claim</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Victorian Supreme Court yesterday dismissed a claim for breach of confidence brought against Incitec Pivot by former leasing consultants, MMFC.  In striking out the plaintiff&#039;s claim, which was commenced in July 2008, Justice Croft found that MMFC had failed to identify or define information capable of protection as confidential information. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/supreme-court-dismisses-confidential-information-claim&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/supreme-court-dismisses-confidential-information-claim#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/subjects/confidentiality">Confidentiality</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/subjects/litigation-and-procedure">Litigation and procedure</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/relevant-partner/select-a-partner/robert-cooper">Robert Cooper</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 13:19:22 +1000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mallesons IP Whiteboard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">439 at http://blogs.mallesons.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Painaway case reveals some painful IP licensing lessons</title>
 <link>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/painaway-case-reveals-some-painful-ip-licensing-lessons</link>
 <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoBodyText&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Painaway Australia v JAKL Group&lt;/em&gt; both confirms and undermines the value of exclusively licensing trade secrets and provides some painful lessons in drafting IP licences. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/painaway-case-reveals-some-painful-ip-licensing-lessons&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/painaway-case-reveals-some-painful-ip-licensing-lessons#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/subjects/confidentiality">Confidentiality</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/sectors/health-pharmaceuticals">Health &amp;amp; pharmaceuticals</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/subjects/trade-marks">Trade marks</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/relevant-partner/select-a-partner/scott-bouvier">Scott Bouvier</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:13:28 +1000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mallesons IP Whiteboard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">414 at http://blogs.mallesons.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>If you want to stop your ex-employees starting up a competitor business, Blackmagic won’t get you there!</title>
 <link>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/if-you-want-to-stop-your-ex-employees-starting-up-a-competitor-business-blackmagic-won-</link>
 <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2011/24.html&quot;&gt;Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd v Overliese&lt;/a&gt; the Full Court of the Federal Court was recently asked to consider the legal remedies available to an employer in the event that his or her employee appropriates confidential information for the purposes of establishing a competitor business.   &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/if-you-want-to-stop-your-ex-employees-starting-up-a-competitor-business-blackmagic-won-&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/if-you-want-to-stop-your-ex-employees-starting-up-a-competitor-business-blackmagic-won-#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/subjects/confidentiality">Confidentiality</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/sectors/technology-media-entertainment-telecommunications/media-entertainment">Media &amp;amp; entertainment</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/sectors/technology-media-entertainment-telecommunications/technology">Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/sectors/technology-media-entertainment-telecommunications">Technology, media, entertainment &amp;amp; telecommunications</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/relevant-partner/select-a-partner/patrick-gunning">Patrick Gunning</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 09:34:35 +1100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mallesons IP Whiteboard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">395 at http://blogs.mallesons.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Federal Court upholds TGA decision to refuse access to documents relating to applications to list generics on the ARTG</title>
 <link>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/federal-court-upholds-tga-decision-to-refuse-access-to-documents-relating-to-applicatio</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;In December last year, Justice Emmett of the Federal Court handed down an important decision for originator pharmaceutical companies who seek access to documents evidencing applications to list generic versions of their products on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG), and generic companies who assume such applications are kept confidential.  &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/federal-court-upholds-tga-decision-to-refuse-access-to-documents-relating-to-applicatio&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/federal-court-upholds-tga-decision-to-refuse-access-to-documents-relating-to-applicatio#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/subjects/confidentiality">Confidentiality</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/sectors/government">Government</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/sectors/health-pharmaceuticals">Health &amp;amp; pharmaceuticals</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/sectors/government/national">National</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/subjects/patents">Patents</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/sectors/government/regulators">Regulators</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/relevant-partner/select-a-partner/kim-oconnell">Kim O&amp;#039;Connell</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:38:59 +1100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mallesons IP Whiteboard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">377 at http://blogs.mallesons.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;The Prince and the Paparazzi&quot; - William vows to protect Kate Middleton&#039;s privacy</title>
 <link>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/the-prince-and-the-paparazzi-william-vows-to-protect-kate-middletons-privacy</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;When Prince William proposed to Kate Middleton, he renewed his vows to protect her privacy.  But what protections from the paparazzi will the soon-to-be Princess have if she visits her Australian relatives? &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/the-prince-and-the-paparazzi-william-vows-to-protect-kate-middletons-privacy&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/the-prince-and-the-paparazzi-william-vows-to-protect-kate-middletons-privacy#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/subjects/confidentiality">Confidentiality</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/sectors/technology-media-entertainment-telecommunications/media-entertainment">Media &amp;amp; entertainment</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/sectors/technology-media-entertainment-telecommunications">Technology, media, entertainment &amp;amp; telecommunications</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/relevant-partner/select-a-partner/katrina-rathie">Katrina Rathie</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:23:52 +1100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mallesons IP Whiteboard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">355 at http://blogs.mallesons.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Who owns Bratz?  Girls with a “passion for fashion” given another chance</title>
 <link>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/who-owns-bratz-girls-with-a-passion-for-fashion-given-another-chance</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Kozinski CJ of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has won IP Whiteboard’s inaugural “Judgment of the Year” for a fantastic dissertation on the ongoing wars between Mattel and MGA Entertainment over ownership of the &quot;bratty-doll idea&quot;. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/who-owns-bratz-girls-with-a-passion-for-fashion-given-another-chance&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/who-owns-bratz-girls-with-a-passion-for-fashion-given-another-chance#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/subjects/confidentiality">Confidentiality</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/subjects/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/relevant-partner/select-a-partner/natalie-hickey">Natalie Hickey</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:42:47 +1000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mallesons IP Whiteboard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">301 at http://blogs.mallesons.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>China amends the definition of &quot;state secrets&quot;</title>
 <link>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/china-amends-the-definition-of-state-secrets</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Following on from the Chinese State Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;/blogs/ipwhiteboard/new-guidance-on-commercial-secrets-in-china&quot;&gt;decision&lt;/a&gt; to release guidance on what constitutes a &quot;commercial secret&quot;, the National People’s Congress has amended the PRC Law on State Secrets, a much more significant piece of legislation. The amendments narrow considerably the definition of state secrets.  Mallesons&#039; Nicolas Groffman examines the changes and their implications for anyone exchanging information with Chinese entities &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mallesons.com/publications/2010/May/10332099W.htm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/china-amends-the-definition-of-state-secrets#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/subjects/confidentiality">Confidentiality</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/relevant-partner/select-a-partner/natalie-hickey">Natalie Hickey</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 13:59:33 +1000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mallesons IP Whiteboard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">244 at http://blogs.mallesons.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New guidance on commercial secrets in China</title>
 <link>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/new-guidance-on-commercial-secrets-in-china</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the wake of the Stern Hu/Rio Tinto case, the Chinese State Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission has released guidance on what constitutes a &quot;commercial secret&quot;.  Mallesons&#039; Nicolas Groffman examines the implications of this guidance for Australians investing in China &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mallesons.com/publications/2010/Apr/10326296W.htm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://blogs.mallesons.com/ipwhiteboard/new-guidance-on-commercial-secrets-in-china#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/subjects/confidentiality">Confidentiality</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/sectors/energy-resources-projects">Energy, resources &amp;amp; projects</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/sectors/energy-resources-projects/metals-mining">Metals &amp;amp; mining</category>
 <category domain="http://blogs.mallesons.com/category/relevant-partner/select-a-partner/natalie-hickey">Natalie Hickey</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:09:20 +1000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mallesons IP Whiteboard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">239 at http://blogs.mallesons.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

